Information for Authors
The primary objective of the editorial process is the selection of the highest quality of papers for publication in the journal. At the CJE, papers are assigned to a co-editor (or the editor), at which point the assigned co-editor has full responsibility concerning the publication decision of a manuscript. Editorial decisions (e.g., reject, accept, or request revision) are made by the co-editor. Usually, co-editors will draw on the advice of two referees. Occasionally, a decision will be made on the basis of only one review. Even more rarely, but increasingly common given the level of submissions, is a rejection without referees (also known as a "summary rejection.") Co-editors are reluctant to render a decision without the advice of a referee. But if after reading a paper, it seems unlikely that a paper will ultimately be accepted, it is in everyone's interest for a decision to be rendered quickly and efficiently. It should be underscored that such a rejection need not reflect negatively on the quality of the paper: it may simply be a poor match for a general interest journal like the CJE. Given the low submission fee relative to the editorial resources involved, even for decisions involving only a co-editor (no referees), we regret that the CJE is unable to provide refunds after a paper has been submitted.
Key Statistics for Authors (based on 2013 data)
- Median turnaround-time to first decision: 94 days
- Acceptance rate: 15%